Supreme Court Defers Ruling on Trump's Bid to Remove Copyright Office Head Shira Perlmutter

Supreme Court Puts Off Decision on Copyright Office Leadership

The U.S. Supreme Court announced on Wednesday, November 26, 2025, that it would defer a decision on the Trump administration's request to remove Shira Perlmutter, the current head of the U.S. Copyright Office. The Court indicated it would not act on the government's application to pause a lower court's ruling that had temporarily reinstated Perlmutter, choosing instead to await rulings on two other significant cases concerning presidential firing authority.

This deferral means that Perlmutter will remain in her position as Register of Copyrights for the time being. The high court's decision was issued in a brief, unsigned order, though Justice Clarence Thomas noted he would have granted the administration's request to remove her.

Context of the Dispute

The legal battle began in May 2025 when the Trump administration fired Shira Perlmutter. Her dismissal followed the release of a Copyright Office report on artificial intelligence that allegedly contained recommendations with which the administration disagreed. Perlmutter subsequently challenged her removal in federal court, arguing that the president lacked the authority to dismiss her. She contended that her role as Register of Copyrights is a legislative, not executive, position, as the Copyright Office operates within the Library of Congress.

A U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly initially rejected her request for temporary reinstatement. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed that ruling, instructing the Trump administration to allow Perlmutter to resume her duties. The full appeals court upheld this decision, prompting the administration to seek intervention from the Supreme Court on October 27, 2025.

Legal Arguments and Broader Implications

The Trump administration, through Solicitor General D. John Sauer, argued to the justices that even though the Copyright Office is housed within the Library of Congress, the Register of Copyrights 'wields executive power' by issuing regulations and enforcing copyright laws, thus making the position subject to presidential removal. Conversely, Perlmutter maintained that the Library of Congress is not an 'executive agency' and that her appointment by the Librarian of Congress signifies her role as a legislative officer, not an executive one.

The Supreme Court's decision to defer action on Perlmutter's case is linked to two other high-profile cases it plans to hear: Trump v. Slaughter, involving Federal Trade Commission Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, and Trump v. Cook, concerning Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. Arguments for these cases are scheduled for December and January, respectively. These cases collectively represent a significant test of the president's authority to remove officials from independent agencies and those with ties to the legislative branch, potentially reshaping the balance of power between the executive and other branches of government.

Shira Perlmutter's Background

Shira Perlmutter was appointed as the 14th Register of Copyrights and Director of the U.S. Copyright Office in October 2020 by Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden. Prior to this role, she served as Chief Policy Officer and Director for International Affairs at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) since 2012. Her extensive career also includes positions at the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), Time Warner, and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), as well as a period as a law professor specializing in intellectual property.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

5 Comments

Avatar of Africa

Africa

It's understandable that the court wants to consider the broader implications with the other cases, but this delay prolongs a politically charged situation that could impact important intellectual property policy.

Avatar of Habibi

Habibi

Perlmutter clearly disagreed with the admin. She should be gone.

Avatar of Kyle Broflovski

Kyle Broflovski

SCOTUS made the right call here. No rush on such a critical issue.

Avatar of Stan Marsh

Stan Marsh

What a joke. The President needs control over his own administration.

Avatar of Eric Cartman

Eric Cartman

While it's good to ensure proper legal process, this deferral leaves a lot of uncertainty about presidential power. It's a tricky balance between executive authority and agency independence.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar