Concerns Rise Among Lawmakers About Domestic Terrorism on 9/11 Anniversary

On the occasion of the 24th anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks, a bipartisan group of Congress members voiced their increasing worries about domestic terrorism and its potential effects on American citizens. Republican Representative Tim Burchett from Tennessee, when asked about his concerns regarding domestic versus foreign terrorists, underscored the importance of maintaining awareness of all threats, but specifically blamed the political left for contributing to violence following the assassination of conservative figure Charlie Kirk.

Representative Chip Roy, a Republican from Texas, elaborated on the necessity of upholding the rule of law to facilitate constructive dialogue. He acknowledged the variety of threats, both international and domestic, but stressed that respect for legal frameworks must be restored to maintain societal order. Meanwhile, Rep. Jodey Arrington, also from Texas, expressed that domestic threats were imminent, tying his worries to lax border security and referencing his experiences on 9/11 with former President George W. Bush.

Similarly, Rep. Troy Nehls criticized the current administration for allowing potential terrorists to cross the southern border, referencing specific incidents of violence attributed to these individuals. He lamented the rising tension in conversations among citizens, noting the alarming trend of escalating violence over differing opinions. Rep. Don Bacon from Nebraska remarked that while foreign threats persist, the spiritual disconnection in society is fostering an increase in domestic unrest, fueled by online anger and division.

Democrats likewise articulated their fears surrounding domestic terrorism. Representative André Carson from Indiana emphasized that this issue occupies his thoughts significantly, expressing a willingness to collaborate with Republicans and community leaders to enhance public safety. Rep. Ritchie Torres from New York raised concerns about the rise of violent extremism facilitated by social media, stating that the safety of public figures is increasingly at risk, leading to greater caution among lawmakers regarding public engagements.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

6 Comments

Avatar of Muchacha

Muchacha

The focus on "online anger" ignores the real-world factors that contribute to radicalization and violence.

Avatar of Comandante

Comandante

The concerns about border security are completely valid. We need to secure our borders.

Avatar of Bella Ciao

Bella Ciao

This article proves politicians are out of touch.

Avatar of Muchacha

Muchacha

Border security is a complex issue. Reducing it to "allowing potential terrorists" is simplistic and inflammatory.

Avatar of Mariposa

Mariposa

The politicians are right about the division and the negative effects of social media.

Avatar of ytkonos

ytkonos

They're talking about "rule of law" but often seem to ignore it when it benefits them politically. Hypocritical.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar