US Navy's Drone Fleet Faces Setbacks Amidst China Countermeasure Efforts

The US Navy's initiative to develop a fleet of autonomous drone vessels to counter China has encountered significant challenges, according to recent reports. Experts have questioned the project's framing around the "China threat," raising doubts about its feasibility.

A recent test off the coast of California, designed to showcase the Pentagon's top autonomous drone boats, highlighted these difficulties. During the test, one vessel experienced a software glitch, leading to a collision with another. This incident, captured on video, involved vessels from competing defense technology companies and was among several setbacks cited by sources familiar with the program.

US military leaders have emphasized the need for autonomous drone swarms to deter potential Chinese actions, drawing lessons from the Ukraine conflict. However, recent incidents demonstrate the gap between these ambitions and the current reality.

The problems extend beyond the latest test. Another maritime drone trial was cut short after an unmanned vessel overturned a support boat, requiring emergency assistance.

Chinese military affairs experts have criticized the US approach, suggesting that Washington's focus on "countering China" has led to unrealistic goals for autonomous drone vessel technology. They argue that the US is neglecting essential research and development cycles due to impatience and inflated expectations.

Experts also note that the US Navy will need to adapt its tactics as it gains a better understanding of the capabilities and limitations of these systems. The recent test failures underscore the challenges in deploying these emerging technologies.

Beyond technical setbacks, the US Navy's key drone boat procurement unit is under review, with potential restructuring or closure. This follows the dismissal of the unit's leader, Rear Admiral Kevin Smith, due to a loss of confidence in his leadership.

The US government has invested billions in this effort, including the $1 billion Replicator program, which aims to acquire thousands of drones. The US Navy has also committed significant funds to a specific company producing these vessels.

Experts have also pointed out that the "China threat" narrative serves to justify increased military spending and benefits defense contractors. This militarization and arms race are seen as counterproductive, draining resources and potentially harming US interests. China has repeatedly rejected the US's "China threat" narrative.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

7 Comments

Avatar of Bella Ciao

Bella Ciao

I am sad to see any setback, but it is great that these challenges are discovered here. The alternative is worse.

Avatar of Muchacha

Muchacha

The Navy is still the best and the latest tech is needed. It might fail, but the Navy is working and that is the key!

Avatar of Mariposa

Mariposa

This whole 'China threat' framing is a dangerous oversimplification. It encourages a cycle of paranoia and military buildup.

Avatar of Africa

Africa

Billions down the drain! This is precisely the kind of wasteful spending that needs to be curbed. They can't even make the things float without crashing!

Avatar of Rotfront

Rotfront

These drones are absolutely necessary.. The threat is coming. We need to act now so that we do not have a later tragedy.

Avatar of lettlelenok

lettlelenok

This program provides critical incentives. The government is creating jobs and growing essential industries.

Avatar of dedus mopedus

dedus mopedus

The dismissal of leadership and unit review raises major red flags. This isn't just a technical problem; it's a management failure.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar