CaixaBank Fined Over €30 Million for Anti-Money Laundering Failings in Skyscraper Deal

Spanish Regulator Imposes Significant AML Penalties

CaixaBank, one of Spain's largest financial institutions, has been fined more than €30 million by the Spanish Anti-Money Laundering Supervisory Authority (Sepblac) for significant anti-money laundering (AML) failings. The penalties stem from a real estate transaction dating back nearly a decade, involving the sale of a prominent Madrid skyscraper. This represents one of the largest AML fines ever imposed in Spain.

A specific fine of €17.6 million was officially published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) on December 11, 2025, under resolution BOE-A-2025-26201. While this particular penalty was made public, reports indicate that additional sanctions related to the same case bring the total amount to over €30 million.

Skyscraper Sale at the Heart of the Investigation

The core of the regulatory action is linked to the 2016 sale of the Torre Foster, also known as Torre Cepsa, a skyscraper located in Madrid. The transaction involved Bankia, a lender that CaixaBank acquired in 2021, selling the building to Amancio Ortega, the founder of Inditex, for approximately €500 million. Spanish authorities have been investigating this deal for potential compliance violations, particularly concerning anti-money laundering and due diligence procedures.

Nature of the AML Failings

The fines were imposed due to a 'very serious infringement' of AML rules, specifically a 'violation of the regulations on the prevention of money laundering and the financing of terrorism'. Investigations revealed that Bankia, prior to its acquisition by CaixaBank, failed to report suspicious activity even after an employee had internally flagged concerns regarding potential money laundering. Regulators also identified that the bank failed to apply enhanced due diligence on high-risk clients and ignored suspicious transaction alerts. The transaction reportedly involved Khadem al-Qubaisi, the former chairman of energy giant Cepsa, who allegedly used a complex network of shell companies and offshore accounts to orchestrate the acquisition and resale of the skyscraper, concealing illicit capital flows.

CaixaBank's Response and Broader Implications

CaixaBank has stated that it has appealed the fines. The bank has declined to comment further on the matter, as has the Economy Ministry, which oversees Sepblac. This enforcement action underscores the strict liability of financial institutions in Spain to act as a barrier against criminal capital flows and signals a broader trend of increased regulatory scrutiny on high-value real estate deals within the Spanish financial system.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

5 Comments

Avatar of Kyle Broflovski

Kyle Broflovski

While strict AML enforcement is vital for financial integrity, penalizing CaixaBank for issues inherited from Bankia years after the fact does raise questions about proportional responsibility. It's a complex situation.

Avatar of Eric Cartman

Eric Cartman

This feels like a political move more than genuine enforcement. Why now?

Avatar of Michelangelo

Michelangelo

While the fine highlights serious negligence regarding suspicious activity and due diligence, the scale of the operation involving shell companies shows how difficult it can be. Banks need to be better, but criminals are also sophisticated.

Avatar of Leonardo

Leonardo

This fine sends a clear message. No one is above the law, especially financial giants.

Avatar of Donatello

Donatello

Holding financial institutions accountable is non-negotiable for preventing money laundering. However, the appeal suggests CaixaBank believes there's a nuance to their responsibility, possibly due to the acquisition details.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar