South Korea Secures Full Annulment in Lone Star Funds Arbitration, Avoids $216.5 Million Payout

Decisive Ruling by ICSID Annulment Committee

The Republic of Korea has secured a decisive legal victory against the U.S. private equity firm Lone Star Funds, with an annulment committee of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), a World Bank arbitration tribunal, ruling in favor of South Korea on Tuesday, November 18, 2025. This ruling completely nullifies a previous August 2022 decision that had ordered South Korea to pay $216.5 million in damages, plus interest, to Lone Star Funds. The total liability, including interest, had amounted to approximately 400 billion won (around $273.2 million).

Prime Minister Kim Min-seok, in an emergency briefing, hailed the decision as 'a significant achievement in protecting public finances and taxpayer money' and stated that it 'affirms Korea's sovereign right to financial regulation'. The annulment committee also ordered Lone Star Funds to reimburse the Korean government approximately 7.3 billion won (between $4.98 million and $5 million) in legal expenses within 30 days.

Background of the Protracted Dispute

The legal battle originated in November 2012 when Lone Star Funds initiated an Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) case against the South Korean government. The firm claimed that the Korean government had unfairly interfered in its attempt to sell its stake in Korea Exchange Bank (KEB), leading to alleged losses of $4.68 billion.

  • 2003: Lone Star Funds acquired a 51% stake in KEB for 1.38 trillion won.
  • 2012: The firm sold KEB to Hana Financial Group for 3.92 trillion won.
  • The dispute was further complicated by public criticism regarding the 'bargain' sale of a major financial institution and allegations of stock manipulation involving KEB's credit card unit, as well as tax issues.

Grounds for Annulment

South Korea's successful annulment hinged on arguments that the original 2022 ICSID tribunal ruling contained severe procedural flaws. Specifically, the Korean government contended that the tribunal had improperly relied on an International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration award between Lone Star and Hana Financial Group. South Korea argued that it was not a party to this ICC proceeding and was therefore deprived of its right to present arguments and cross-examine witnesses, constituting a 'fundamental violation of procedural rules' and a 'serious departure from due process'.

A Rare Outcome in International Arbitration

The complete annulment of an ICSID award is an exceptionally rare occurrence. According to ICSID data, out of 503 rulings between 1972 and 2025, only 25 cases had their annulment applications accepted, and among these, only 8 cases resulted in a complete annulment. This represents a mere 1.6% probability of such an outcome. This victory marks a significant precedent and reinforces international confidence in Korea's regulatory and legal processes, as stated by Prime Minister Kim Min-seok.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

9 Comments

Avatar of Comandante

Comandante

It's certainly a victory for South Korea's legal arguments, but the underlying issues surrounding the initial KEB sale and public criticism haven't entirely disappeared. This saga reveals deeper questions about financial governance.

Avatar of Muchacho

Muchacho

An incredible legal achievement! Beating those odds is truly remarkable.

Avatar of ZmeeLove

ZmeeLove

ICSID processes seem inherently flawed if such a rare annulment was even necessary. What a waste.

Avatar of Habibi

Habibi

The annulment doesn't change the fact Lone Star made massive profits. Still a bad look.

Avatar of Coccinella

Coccinella

The procedural victory is a strong vindication for South Korea's legal team, proving the previous tribunal erred. Nevertheless, it doesn't fully address the lingering public sentiment about foreign equity firms making huge profits from domestic assets and the ethical implications involved.

Avatar of lettlelenok

lettlelenok

Fantastic news for South Korea and taxpayers! A truly decisive victory.

Avatar of ytkonos

ytkonos

This annulment reinforces South Korea's sovereign right to regulate its markets, which is crucial. Yet, the rarity of such an outcome also underscores the difficulty countries face when challenging international arbitration decisions, making future ISDS cases still a concern.

Avatar of dedus mopedus

dedus mopedus

This could deter foreign investment. Are international agreements truly reliable anymore?

Avatar of Noir Black

Noir Black

Years of legal costs and uncertainty. Is this really a 'win' when so much was spent?

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar