Knesset Erupts as Speaker Ohana Refers to Supreme Court President as 'Judge'

Knesset Winter Session Opens Amidst Judicial Tensions

The opening of the Knesset's winter session on Monday, October 20, 2025, was immediately plunged into controversy following remarks by Speaker Amir Ohana. The incident, which saw opposition lawmakers removed from the plenum, highlighted the ongoing and deeply divisive struggle between Israel's government and its judiciary. The session, a significant event in the Israeli political calendar, quickly devolved into a heated exchange over the proper recognition of the Supreme Court's leadership.

Speaker's Introduction Sparks Outrage

The uproar began when Speaker Amir Ohana, a member of the Likud party, introduced Supreme Court President Isaac Amit not by his full title, but simply as a 'judge' or 'justice.' This deliberate omission of Amit's presidential title was immediately perceived by the opposition as a provocative slight. The move is understood within the context of a prolonged dispute over judicial authority and appointments, particularly following Justice Minister Yariv Levin's previous opposition to Amit's ascension to the presidency. Levin had notably boycotted Amit's swearing-in ceremony in February 2025, and Ohana himself had excluded Amit from a recent address by former US President Donald Trump to the Knesset.

Opposition MKs Removed Amidst Protests

The Speaker's remarks triggered an immediate and vocal backlash from opposition Members of Knesset (MKs). Several lawmakers interrupted Ohana's speech with shouts and boos. In response to their persistent objections, MKs Gilad Kariv of The Democrats and Naor Shiri, along with Meirav Cohen of Yesh Atid, were forcibly removed from the plenum. Following his removal, Kariv stated that Ohana was 'trampling the honor of the Knesset, the honor of the judicial system, and the honor of Israeli society as a whole.' Opposition Leader Yair Lapid further criticized Ohana, accusing him of 'weakening the State of Israel' and leading the country back to 'division and destructive rupture.'

President Herzog Intervenes, Ohana Defends Actions

In a notable intervention, Israeli President Isaac Herzog, who spoke after the initial commotion, deliberately referred to Isaac Amit by his full title, 'President of the Supreme Court,' a gesture that drew applause from the opposition. Herzog expressed strong disapproval of the incident, stating he would 'not accept basic disrespect' and that his 'heart is bleeding' over the lack of courtesy shown to the judicial branch. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later acknowledged Amit's title but also emphasized the authority of the legislative and executive branches. Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi, however, supported Ohana, claiming Amit had 'appointed himself by force' and was not legally the president.

For his part, Speaker Amir Ohana defended his actions by criticizing the judicial system, alleging it was 'trampling the Knesset and harming democracy.' He asserted that voters' democratic power was 'being eroded…because of the conduct of the judicial system,' and emphasized a desire for 'the rule of law, not the rule of jurists,' arguing that the judiciary operates 'without checks and balances.'

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

5 Comments

Avatar of Fuerza

Fuerza

It's clear there's a deep-seated issue with judicial authority that needs addressing, but Ohana's method was needlessly provocative. A more constructive dialogue is essential to resolve these fundamental disagreements.

Avatar of Manolo Noriega

Manolo Noriega

Attacking the judiciary is a dangerous path.

Avatar of Fuerza

Fuerza

While the government's frustration with judicial power is understandable, public displays of disrespect only escalate tensions further. Both sides need to find common ground for the sake of the country.

Avatar of Ongania

Ongania

Disagreements over judicial power are important for a healthy democracy, but this incident shows a breakdown in basic civility. Leaders must model respect even when they strongly disagree on policy.

Avatar of Manolo Noriega

Manolo Noriega

While the judicial system definitely needs checks and balances, publicly demeaning its leadership is counterproductive and only serves to deepen the societal rifts. A more dignified approach would yield better results.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar