Court Rules on Graphic Evidence
An Idaho judge has ruled to block the full release of graphic crime scene photographs related to the Bryan Kohberger murder case. On October 1, 2025, Second District Judge Megan Marshall issued a decision preventing the dissemination of images depicting the bodies of the four University of Idaho students or the blood immediately surrounding them. The ruling cited significant privacy concerns for the victims' families and the potential for 'extreme emotional distress' if such images were to circulate publicly.
Privacy Concerns Outweigh Public Interest
Judge Marshall's decision emphasizes that the privacy interests of the victims' families outweigh the public's interest in viewing the most disturbing aspects of the crime scene. The judge stated, 'There is little to be gained by the public in seeing the decedents' bodies, the blood soaked sheets, blood spatter or other death-scene depictions,' adding that their release 'has and will continue to have profound effect upon the decedents' loved ones.' The ruling mandates that the city of Moscow must black out these specific graphic portions from any released photographs or videos.
Background of the Kohberger Case
The case involves the November 2022 murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen, and Ethan Chapin at an off-campus rental home in Moscow, Idaho. Bryan Kohberger was sentenced to life without parole in July 2025 after pleading guilty to the stabbings. Following Kohberger's sentencing, the Moscow Police Department received hundreds of public records requests for investigative files.
Partial Release of Records Permitted
While the most graphic images are now protected, the court's ruling does allow for the release of other investigatory records. These include:
- Images of the residence interior and exterior
- Photographs of personal items found inside the home
- Witness statements and other documents connected to the case
5 Comments
Raphael
No one needs to see those horrific images. This is about basic human decency.
Donatello
It's heartbreaking for the families, and I empathize with their request. However, limiting access to evidence, even graphic, can erode public trust in the judicial process over time.
Leonardo
Victims' privacy over public morbid curiosity, always. Good job, Judge Marshall.
Rotfront
If it's evidence, it should be seen. No exceptions for public interest.
Leonardo
What are they hiding? Full evidence should always be public record.