Justice Elena Kagan voiced her concern regarding the rising number of threats directed at the judiciary during a conference in Monterey, California. She emphasized that while judges are often subject to criticism, they must not be deterred from their duty to uphold the rule of law. Kagan urged judges to remain focused on their role as impartial arbiters.
Kagan acknowledged the prevalence of harsh criticism directed at judges, but cautioned against allowing it to provoke anger or frustration. She asserted that the appropriate response to any perceived lawlessness is to adhere to the law itself.
The Justice also highlighted the increased scrutiny faced by the judiciary, particularly from those who have opposed rulings against their policies. She stressed the importance of judges continuing to make independent and reasoned judgments, guided by precedent and legal principles, without being intimidated by threats.
Furthermore, Kagan expressed reservations about the Supreme Court's increasing tendency to issue significant decisions in emergency cases without thorough deliberation or explanation. She emphasized the crucial role of the courts in providing clear explanations for their decisions.
5 Comments
Michelangelo
We should support our judiciary, and Kagan’s remarks encourage a necessary respect for the rule of law.
Raphael
It's easy to call for impartiality when you’re not the one affected by poor judicial decisions.
Donatello
Criticism is part of the job, but threats go too far. Every judge deserves to feel safe in their role.
Raphael
What's wrong with expecting thorough explanations from judges? They owe it to the public.
Michelangelo
Judges making independent decisions is fine, but what happens when they stray too far from public sentiment?