Ex-AGF Abubakar Malami, Son Arraigned on Terrorism and Firearms Charges in Abuja

Former AGF and Son Face Five-Count Charge

Abubakar Malami (SAN), Nigeria's former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, along with his son, Abdulaziz Abubakar Malami, were arraigned on Tuesday, February 3, 2026, before the Federal High Court in Abuja. The arraignment, conducted by the Department of State Services (DSS), involved a five-count charge related to alleged terrorism financing and illegal possession of firearms. Both defendants pleaded 'not guilty' to all charges.

Details of the Allegations

The charges brought against the former AGF and his son are multifaceted. The first count specifically targets Abubakar Malami, accusing him of knowingly abetting terrorism financing. This allegation stems from his purported refusal to prosecute suspected terrorism financiers whose case files were submitted to his office in November 2022, during his tenure at the Federal Ministry of Justice in Maitama, Abuja. This alleged act is contrary to Section 26(2) of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

The remaining four counts (Counts Two to Five) are jointly leveled against both Abubakar Malami and Abdulaziz Abubakar Malami. These charges involve engaging in conduct preparatory to an act of terrorism and unlawful possession of firearms and ammunition. Specifically, the DSS alleges that in December 2025, at their residence in Gesse Phase II Area, Birnin Kebbi Local Government Area, Kebbi State, they were found in possession of:

  • A Sturm Magnum 17-0101 firearm without a license.
  • 16 Redstar AAA 5.20 live rounds of cartridges.
  • 27 expended Redstar AAA 5.20 cartridges without lawful authority.
These alleged offenses are said to contravene Section 29 of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, and Sections 3 and 8(1) of the Firearms Act, 2004.

Court Proceedings and Adjournment

During the arraignment before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, the prosecuting counsel, Calistus Eze, requested that the defendants be remanded in DSS custody pending the commencement of the trial. The defense counsel, Shuaibu Aruwan (SAN), made an oral application for bail, arguing that the defendants had already been in DSS custody for over two weeks. However, Justice Abdulmalik rejected the oral bail application, stating that the Federal High Court, as a court of record, requires a formal written application for bail.

The court subsequently ordered the defendants to be remanded in DSS custody and adjourned the matter until February 20 for the commencement of the trial and hearing of the formal bail application.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

5 Comments

Avatar of Raphael

Raphael

While the charges are serious, especially concerning terrorism financing, it's crucial that Malami and his son receive a fair trial and are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The legal process must be transparent.

Avatar of Donatello

Donatello

Excellent work by the DSS. This sends a strong message against impunity.

Avatar of Raphael

Raphael

Holding former powerful figures accountable is a positive step for governance and justice. Nevertheless, the rejection of an oral bail application, while procedurally correct, underscores the strictness of the judicial process in high-profile cases.

Avatar of Donatello

Donatello

It's high time former officials faced justice for alleged wrongdoings. Good development.

Avatar of Raphael

Raphael

Pleading 'not guilty' is expected. Let the courts conduct a thorough process.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar