Mandatory Institutional Mechanisms
Under the new regulations, all HEIs are now mandated to establish robust mechanisms to prevent and address discrimination. Key among these are the creation of Equity Committees and the strengthening of Equal Opportunity Centres (EOCs). These committees are required to have diverse representation, including members from Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), Other Backward Classes (OBCs), women, and persons with disabilities, to ensure a broad perspective in handling complaints.
Furthermore, institutions must operate 24-hour helplines and maintain online complaint systems to allow students, teachers, and non-teaching staff to report incidents without delay. The regulations also introduce the concept of 'Equity Squads' for maintaining vigil on campus and designating 'Equity Ambassadors' in various departments and facilities to act as points of contact with the EOCs.
Time-Bound Redressal and Protection for Complainants
A critical aspect of the new rules is the emphasis on time-bound action for grievance redressal. Upon receiving a complaint, the Equity Committee is required to convene within 24 hours, complete its inquiry within 15 working days, and submit its findings to the head of the institution. Action on the committee's recommendations must then follow within the next seven days. The regulations explicitly state that complainants must not face academic, administrative, or personal harassment for raising concerns, ensuring their protection. Aggrieved individuals also have the right to appeal the committee's report to an Ombudsperson within 30 days.
Expanded Scope and Penalties for Non-Compliance
The new regulations broaden the definition of caste-based discrimination to explicitly include acts against Other Backward Classes (OBCs), a significant change from the draft version that had drawn criticism. The definition of 'discrimination' itself is comprehensive, covering any unfair treatment based on religion, race, caste, gender, place of birth, or disability. To ensure compliance, the UGC has outlined a national-level monitoring system and institutional vigilance teams. Institutions that fail to implement these regulations may face severe penalties, including the denial of UGC grants, exclusion from central schemes, debarment from offering degrees or academic programmes, or even the withdrawal of recognition.
Context and Objectives
These updated regulations supersede and strengthen the earlier 2012 anti-discrimination guidelines. Their notification follows persistent concerns raised by courts, student groups, and parents regarding inadequate mechanisms to address caste-based discrimination on campuses. The Supreme Court had previously directed the UGC to finalize robust anti-discrimination regulations, particularly in light of tragic incidents such as the suicides of Rohith Vemula and Payal Tadvi, which were allegedly linked to caste bias. The regulations also mandate that all students, faculty, and staff furnish an undertaking to promote equity and refrain from any form of discrimination.
5 Comments
Bermudez
Excellent move by UGC. Protecting vulnerable students is paramount, and these rules are comprehensive.
paracelsus
While the mandate for Equity Committees and time-bound redressal is commendable, there's a risk of these bodies becoming overburdened or ineffective without sufficient training and resources for their members.
eliphas
What about false complaints? This system could be easily misused to target individuals.
paracelsus
The inclusion of helplines and online systems is a positive move for accessibility. However, we must ensure these systems are secure and prevent anonymous targeting, while also protecting genuine complainants.
Raphael
More bureaucracy and committees. This won't change mindsets, just create more paperwork.