Donovan Moodley Denied Parole Again in Leigh Matthews Murder Case

Parole Denied for Leigh Matthews' Killer

Donovan Moodley, who is serving a life sentence for the 2004 abduction and murder of Leigh Matthews, has once again been denied parole by the South African Department of Correctional Services. The decision, announced on Friday, December 19, 2025, means Moodley will remain incarcerated for at least another two years.

The denial follows a recommendation from the National Council for Correctional Services (NCCS) to the Minister of Correctional Services, Dr. Pieter Groenewald, that parole placement not be granted at this stage. This decision comes despite an earlier recommendation for his release by the parole board in September.

Background of the Crime

The case dates back to July 9, 2004, when Leigh Matthews, a 21-year-old university student, was abducted from the parking lot of Bond University in Morningside, Sandton. Moodley kidnapped Matthews and subsequently demanded a ransom from her family. Despite receiving the R50,000 ransom, Moodley tragically murdered Matthews. Her body was discovered on July 21, 2004, in Walkerville.

In 2005, Moodley was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for murder, along with 15 years for kidnapping and 10 years for extortion. The case garnered significant national attention and remains one of South Africa's most closely followed criminal proceedings.

Reasons for Continued Incarceration

The Department of Correctional Services stated that Moodley's parole profile will be resubmitted after a period of 24 months for reconsideration. During this time, he is required to undergo additional structured correctional programmes, psychotherapy sessions, and assessments by independent specialists. These interventions are intended to determine his risk profile and measure his progress in rehabilitation.

Officials emphasized that parole consideration is not automatic and is not solely dependent on the completion of programs or the serving of the minimum required period of incarceration.

Family's Persistent Opposition

The denial aligns with the consistent opposition from the Matthews family, including Leigh's parents, Rob and Sharon Matthews. They have repeatedly advocated for Moodley to remain incarcerated, arguing that he has not taken full accountability for his actions and shows no genuine remorse. The family has actively participated in parole hearings, making representations against his release, citing that his freedom would deny them closure.

Moodley has made several previous attempts to secure parole, all of which have been unsuccessful.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

13 Comments

Avatar of Bermudez

Bermudez

Justice for Leigh Matthews! This decision brings some relief.

Avatar of Africa

Africa

What's the point of rehabilitation if parole is consistently denied?

Avatar of Habibi

Habibi

It's vital that victims' families have a voice in these proceedings, as their suffering is immense. Yet, the article also mentions an earlier recommendation for release, raising questions about the consistency of decision-making.

Avatar of ZmeeLove

ZmeeLove

The right decision. Life means life for such a heinous crime.

Avatar of Coccinella

Coccinella

On one hand, the call for justice for Leigh Matthews is powerful and valid. On the other hand, if a parole board initially found him suitable, the reasons for this current reversal and prolonged denial should be transparent and robust.

Avatar of Donatello

Donatello

When does punishment end and rehabilitation begin? This is excessive.

Avatar of BuggaBoom

BuggaBoom

This feels more like public pressure than a fair legal process.

Avatar of Raphael

Raphael

The need for additional structured correctional programs suggests Moodley still poses a risk, which is concerning for public safety. However, continuously extending incarceration can also strain resources without clear rehabilitation outcomes.

Avatar of Katchuka

Katchuka

Excellent news! He deserves to stay locked up forever.

Avatar of KittyKat

KittyKat

Another two years? He's already served a significant sentence.

Avatar of ytkonos

ytkonos

Good. He shows no genuine remorse. Keep him incarcerated.

Avatar of lettlelenok

lettlelenok

Ensuring public safety and accountability is crucial for such a horrific crime. However, one must question if indefinite denials, even with further programs, truly align with the goals of a correctional system.

Avatar of Katchuka

Katchuka

Is perpetual punishment truly justice?

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar