Independent Senators Step Down in Barbados
Bridgetown, Barbados – Independent Senators Monique Taitt and Dr. Crystal Drakes have officially resigned from the Senate of Barbados, with their departures reported on December 8, 2025. The resignations come in the wake of the appointment of the new President, The Most Honourable Jeffrey Bostic.
Both senators were initially appointed by the former President, The Most Honourable Dame Sandra Mason, whose term concluded on November 29.
Reasons for Resignation
The decision to step down was articulated by both individuals. Monique Taitt, an attorney, indicated that her resignation was the 'appropriate thing to do under the Constitution,' specifically referencing Section 36. She had previously served as an Independent Senator, first appointed in 2018 and again in 2022.
Dr. Crystal Drakes, an economist, stated that she tendered her resignation to provide the newly appointed President with the opportunity to select his own independent senators. Dr. Drakes had returned to the Senate as an Independent Senator in 2022, having previously served as an Opposition Senator.
Composition of the Senate
The Senate of Barbados comprises 21 members. Of these, seven Independent Senators are appointed by the President at their discretion to represent various societal interests. The resignations of Taitt and Drakes will necessitate the appointment of new independent members by President Bostic to fill these vacancies. As of the reports, there has been no indication of further resignations among the remaining independent senators.
Constitutional Context
The Constitution of Barbados outlines the process for senatorial appointments. Independent Senators are chosen by the President without being bound by the advice of other political leaders, ensuring representation for religious, social, economic, or other interests within the country. This mechanism is designed to provide a non-partisan voice within the legislative process.
7 Comments
Coccinella
The stated reasons for resignation are clear and respect the constitutional framework. Yet, the frequent turnover of independent senators could be seen as disruptive to continuity and the consistent representation of diverse societal interests.
Michelangelo
While it's important for a new President to establish their team, losing experienced independent senators means a temporary gap in crucial oversight. We need to ensure the new appointees are truly non-partisan.
Leonardo
On one hand, this allows for a fresh perspective and the President to shape the independent bench. On the other, it's a shame to lose individuals who have already gained valuable insight and understanding of parliamentary processes.
Michelangelo
Losing two experienced voices for what? This weakens the Senate, not strengthens it.
Donatello
Exactly how it should be done. Allows for a fresh start and the President's own choices.
Leonardo
The constitutional argument for their resignation is valid, ensuring the President has discretion. However, one wonders if a system that encourages such turnover truly fosters long-term, independent thought in the Senate.
Raphael
Seems like unnecessary political posturing. Are they truly independent then?