Belgian Prime Minister Warns EU on Risks of Using Frozen Russian Assets for Ukraine

Belgium Expresses Strong Reservations on EU's Russian Asset Plan

Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo has issued a stern warning to the European Union regarding its proposal to use frozen Russian assets to finance Ukraine. De Croo articulated concerns over substantial financial and legal liabilities that could fall upon Belgium, emphasizing the need for comprehensive risk-sharing among EU member states.

Legal and Financial Liabilities Highlighted

The EU's plan involves leveraging frozen Russian state assets, estimated at around €140 billion ($162 billion), to provide a 'compensation loan' to Ukraine. Belgium finds itself at the heart of this debate as it hosts the vast majority of these immobilized assets, approximately €183 billion to €190 billion, at the Brussels-based central securities depository, Euroclear.

Prime Minister De Croo has underscored several critical risks associated with the plan:

  • The potential for Russian retaliation against Belgium.
  • The significant risk of legal challenges and lawsuits should issues arise with the EU loans.
  • Concerns that the scheme could be perceived as 'expropriatory in nature,' potentially undermining investor confidence in the euro and creating systemic risks for Euroclear and broader EU financial markets.
  • A warning that rushing the plan could inadvertently hinder the prospects of a future peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia.

De Croo has reportedly demanded that all EU countries provide full and binding guarantees to share the legal and financial risks, ensuring Belgium is not solely responsible for any potential repayment obligations.

Alternative Funding and Upcoming Decisions

As an alternative, Prime Minister De Croo has suggested that the EU explore using unused borrowing rights within its shared budget to meet Ukraine's financial needs, proposing a sum of €45 billion. This approach, he argues, could be a less risky and potentially more cost-effective solution.

The discussions come as EU leaders prepare for a crucial summit on December 18-19, where decisions on continued funding for Kyiv are expected. The Belgian government's firm stance highlights the complexities and divisions within the bloc regarding the unprecedented use of frozen sovereign assets.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

5 Comments

Avatar of Africa

Africa

The legal and financial risks are simply too high. The EU needs to think long-term here.

Avatar of ZmeeLove

ZmeeLove

It's tempting to use frozen assets for Ukraine, but the concerns about undermining investor confidence and potential Russian retaliation are significant. We need a robust plan, not a rushed one.

Avatar of Muchacho

Muchacho

While Ukraine desperately needs funds, De Croo raises valid points about the potential legal and financial fallout for the EU. A solution balancing aid with stability is crucial.

Avatar of Coccinella

Coccinella

De Croo is absolutely right to demand guarantees. Protect our economy first!

Avatar of Bella Ciao

Bella Ciao

What about the moral imperative? Russia must pay for all the damage they've caused.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar