Belgium Expresses Strong Reservations on EU's Russian Asset Plan
Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo has issued a stern warning to the European Union regarding its proposal to use frozen Russian assets to finance Ukraine. De Croo articulated concerns over substantial financial and legal liabilities that could fall upon Belgium, emphasizing the need for comprehensive risk-sharing among EU member states.
Legal and Financial Liabilities Highlighted
The EU's plan involves leveraging frozen Russian state assets, estimated at around €140 billion ($162 billion), to provide a 'compensation loan' to Ukraine. Belgium finds itself at the heart of this debate as it hosts the vast majority of these immobilized assets, approximately €183 billion to €190 billion, at the Brussels-based central securities depository, Euroclear.
Prime Minister De Croo has underscored several critical risks associated with the plan:
- The potential for Russian retaliation against Belgium.
- The significant risk of legal challenges and lawsuits should issues arise with the EU loans.
- Concerns that the scheme could be perceived as 'expropriatory in nature,' potentially undermining investor confidence in the euro and creating systemic risks for Euroclear and broader EU financial markets.
- A warning that rushing the plan could inadvertently hinder the prospects of a future peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia.
De Croo has reportedly demanded that all EU countries provide full and binding guarantees to share the legal and financial risks, ensuring Belgium is not solely responsible for any potential repayment obligations.
Alternative Funding and Upcoming Decisions
As an alternative, Prime Minister De Croo has suggested that the EU explore using unused borrowing rights within its shared budget to meet Ukraine's financial needs, proposing a sum of €45 billion. This approach, he argues, could be a less risky and potentially more cost-effective solution.
The discussions come as EU leaders prepare for a crucial summit on December 18-19, where decisions on continued funding for Kyiv are expected. The Belgian government's firm stance highlights the complexities and divisions within the bloc regarding the unprecedented use of frozen sovereign assets.
5 Comments
Africa
The legal and financial risks are simply too high. The EU needs to think long-term here.
ZmeeLove
It's tempting to use frozen assets for Ukraine, but the concerns about undermining investor confidence and potential Russian retaliation are significant. We need a robust plan, not a rushed one.
Muchacho
While Ukraine desperately needs funds, De Croo raises valid points about the potential legal and financial fallout for the EU. A solution balancing aid with stability is crucial.
Coccinella
De Croo is absolutely right to demand guarantees. Protect our economy first!
Bella Ciao
What about the moral imperative? Russia must pay for all the damage they've caused.