Iceland Postpones EU Defence Statement Amid Ferroalloy Trade Dispute

Iceland Halts Defence Pact Over EU Metal Tariffs

Reykjavik, IcelandIceland's Foreign Minister Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir declared on November 19, 2025, that Iceland would not proceed with signing a planned security and defence statement with the European Union (EU). The move comes as an 'initial reaction' to the EU's recent decision to implement new protective measures on metal trade, specifically concerning ferroalloys, without granting exemptions to Iceland and Norway.

The security and defence statement was originally scheduled for signing on Thursday, November 20, 2025. Minister Gunnarsdóttir expressed 'heavy and great disappointment' over the EU's stance, stating that it violates the fundamental principles of the European Economic Area (EEA) agreement, which governs trade relations between Iceland, Norway, and the EU.

EU Safeguard Measures on Ferroalloys

The European Commission introduced country-specific limits on ferroalloy imports, which are crucial for steel and iron production. These safeguard measures, effective from November 18, 2025, are set to reduce EU imports of certain silicon- and manganese-based alloying elements by 25% compared to the average import volumes from 2022-2024. The measures, which will remain in place for three years until November 17, 2028, include tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) and minimum prices. The EU justified these actions by citing a sharp rise in ferroalloy imports, which they claim caused 'serious damage' to the European industry due to global overcapacity and import penetration at lower prices.

Iceland and Norway are significant suppliers, collectively accounting for almost half of the EU's ferroalloy imports. Despite protests from both countries, the EU did not grant them an exemption, a decision that has been met with strong criticism from Reykjavik and Oslo.

Broader Implications for EU-Iceland Relations

While expressing immediate dissatisfaction, Minister Gunnarsdóttir also reiterated Iceland's interest in fostering deeper ties with the EU. She emphasized that EU membership is in Reykjavik's geopolitical interests, noting that Iceland might still sign the defence agreement 'maybe in a couple of weeks' if the EU demonstrates a 'clear vision on how they are treating their friends.' Discussions for a Security and Defence Partnership Agreement between the EU and Iceland were initiated in July 2025, following a visit by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to Iceland, aimed at enhancing collaboration on security and defence.

The minister's comments highlight a delicate balance between protecting national economic interests and pursuing broader strategic cooperation. Norway's Foreign Minister also acknowledged the issue as a 'key topic' but ruled out immediate trade countermeasures, emphasizing Norway's status as a small, open economy. The European Commission has indicated it will hold separate consultations with Norway and Iceland to analyze the economic impact of the new measures.

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Time to Read
You earned: None
Date

Post Profit

Post Profit
Earned for Pluses
...
Comment Rewards
...
Likes Own
...
Likes Commenter
...
Likes Author
...
Dislikes Author
...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...

Post Loss

Post Loss
Spent for Minuses
...
Comment Tributes
...
Dislikes Own
...
Dislikes Commenter
...
Post Publish Tribute
...
PnL Reports
...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei

Comment-to-Earn

13 Comments

Avatar of Manolo Noriega

Manolo Noriega

The EU’s protectionist measures might be justified for its internal market, but ignoring EEA partners like Iceland creates unnecessary friction. This situation highlights the complex balance between economic self-interest and geopolitical alliance building.

Avatar of Fuerza

Fuerza

Iceland is right to demand respect for its economic agreements, but leveraging a defense pact in this manner risks alienating a key strategic partner. A more diplomatic approach might serve their long-term security interests better, especially considering the broader geopolitical landscape.

Avatar of Ongania

Ongania

Economic fairness is paramount. The EU can’t expect security cooperation while undermining trade.

Avatar of Fuerza

Fuerza

While Iceland has valid concerns about trade fairness, linking it to a critical security pact seems counterproductive. Both sides need to find a way to separate these issues for the greater good of regional stability.

Avatar of Ongania

Ongania

Iceland is right to prioritize its own industry. The EU broke the spirit of the EEA.

Avatar of ZmeeLove

ZmeeLove

The tension between protecting domestic industries and fostering international cooperation is clear here. While the EU needs to address its ferroalloy market, excluding close allies like Iceland from exemptions could undermine the very unity needed to counter external threats.

Avatar of lettlelenok

lettlelenok

Economic protectionism is a reality. Iceland needs to adapt, not jeopardize crucial alliances.

Avatar of ytkonos

ytkonos

You can’t expect partnership if you’re being treated like a competitor. This sends a clear message.

Avatar of dedus mopedus

dedus mopedus

It’s understandable Iceland feels slighted by the EU’s trade decision, especially given the EEA agreement. However, postponing a defence statement when security concerns are rising globally could send the wrong message about their commitment to collective security.

Avatar of KittyKat

KittyKat

This is incredibly shortsighted. Sacrificing security for a trade dispute is reckless.

Avatar of Katchuka

Katchuka

Delaying security talks benefits no one, especially with global tensions rising. Grow up, Iceland.

Avatar of KittyKat

KittyKat

Iceland is playing a dangerous game. Geopolitical stability is more important than ferroalloys.

Avatar of Noir Black

Noir Black

Good for Iceland! Stand up to the EU bullies when they disregard agreements.

Available from LVL 13

Add your comment

Your comment avatar