Arraignment in Norfolk Federal Court
New York Attorney General Letitia James pleaded not guilty on Friday, October 24, 2025, to federal charges of bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution. The plea was entered in a federal court in Norfolk, Virginia, before U.S. District Judge Jamar Walker. James, 67, was released on her own recognizance.
The charges allege that James misrepresented a 2020 home purchase in Norfolk, Virginia, valued at approximately $137,000, as a secondary residence to obtain more favorable mortgage terms. Prosecutors contend the property was, in fact, used as an investment property and rented out. This alleged misrepresentation reportedly saved her nearly $19,000 over the life of the loan.
Allegations of Political Retribution
Following her arraignment, James addressed supporters outside the courthouse, asserting that the charges are a result of political retribution. She stated, 'This is not about me. This is about all of us and about a justice system which has been weaponized, a justice system which has been used as a tool of revenge…' This sentiment echoes her previous statements, where she described the indictment as 'nothing more than a continuation of the president's desperate weaponization of our justice system.'
The prosecution is being led by U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who has been described as a Donald Trump appointee and former personal lawyer. James's legal team plans to challenge the indictment, arguing that Halligan was unlawfully appointed and that the prosecution is vindictive. This legal strategy aligns with similar challenges made by other figures, including former FBI Director James Comey, who have also faced federal charges under the current administration.
Upcoming Trial and Broader Context
A trial date has been set for January 26, 2026, with proceedings expected to last approximately five days to no more than two weeks. James has been a prominent figure in legal challenges against Donald Trump, notably leading a civil fraud case against him and the Trump Organization. That case resulted in a significant judgment, though the financial penalties were later adjusted on appeal. The charges against James are viewed by many as part of a broader pattern of the Trump administration pursuing legal action against perceived political adversaries.
5 Comments
Raphael
This is clearly political retribution. They're trying to silence anyone who challenges Trump.
Michelangelo
They're coming after her because she dared to hold powerful people accountable. Typical.
Leonardo
Whether it's $1,000 or $19,000, mortgage fraud is a crime. Her political position shouldn't grant immunity.
Michelangelo
This is a desperate attempt to discredit a strong leader. It won't work.
Leonardo
It's difficult to fully separate the alleged financial wrongdoing from the broader political narrative, especially with the prosecutor's background. While accountability is important, the appearance of selective prosecution is also troubling.