Jordan Issues Strong Condemnation
The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan issued a strong condemnation following the entry of Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir into the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem on January 3, 2023. Jordan's Foreign Ministry described the visit as a 'storming' and a 'provocation,' asserting that it constituted a flagrant violation of international law and the historical and legal status quo governing the holy site. In response, Jordan summoned the Israeli ambassador in Amman to formally protest the incident.
Violation of the Status Quo
The Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, known to Jews as the Temple Mount, is Islam's third holiest site and a highly sensitive flashpoint in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Under a long-standing arrangement, referred to as the 'status quo,' the Jerusalem Islamic Waqf, a Jordanian-appointed body, manages the compound, and only Muslims are permitted to pray there. Non-Muslims are allowed to visit but not to worship. Jordan, recognized as the custodian of Muslim and Christian holy sites in Jerusalem under the 1994 peace treaty with Israel, views any perceived alteration to this arrangement as a direct challenge to its role and the site's sanctity.
Ben-Gvir's Visit and Israeli Response
Minister Ben-Gvir, a far-right politician, made the 15-minute visit to the compound shortly after taking office. He stated that his government would 'not surrender to the threats of Hamas' and that the site is 'open to all,' reflecting his long-held advocacy for greater Jewish access and prayer rights at the site. Despite the condemnation, an official from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office affirmed Israel's commitment to 'strictly protecting the status quo' at the holy site, dismissing claims of a change as 'baseless.'
Widespread International Outcry
The incident drew immediate and widespread international criticism. Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh called the visit an 'unprecedented provocation' and an attempt to turn the mosque 'into a Jewish temple.' The Palestinian militant group Hamas warned that such a move would cross a 'red line.' Beyond the immediate region, countries including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Turkey also condemned Ben-Gvir's actions. The United States warned against any steps that would jeopardize the status quo, emphasizing its firm stance on its preservation.
8 Comments
Donatello
It's true that the site is holy to both faiths, and everyone should ideally have access. But given the volatile political climate, such a high-profile visit by a controversial figure seems deliberately provocative and risks dangerous escalation.
Raphael
The status quo is a fragile agreement vital for regional stability, and Ben-Gvir's visit undoubtedly challenges it. Yet, the deep historical and religious connection of Jewish people to the Temple Mount is also a legitimate consideration that needs careful handling.
Leonardo
About time someone asserted Israeli sovereignty. Enough with the threats.
paracelsus
A blatant provocation! This will only inflame tensions further.
eliphas
Don't surrender to Hamas. This is leadership!
paracelsus
Ben-Gvir has every right to visit. It's Israeli territory!
eliphas
Maintaining the delicate balance at holy sites is crucial, and Minister Ben-Gvir's visit understandably caused outrage. However, the root issue of access and prayer rights for all faiths at such a significant location remains a complex, unresolved challenge.
anubis
International law means nothing to these extremists. Unacceptable!