Tsubasa Ito, a young corporate worker with a passion for motorcycles, tragically lost his life when a U.S. Navy sailor, stationed in Yokosuka, Japan, struck him with a vehicle while making an illegal turn. During the subsequent criminal trial, it was revealed that the U.S. military has a policy of transferring personnel back to the United States without facing penalties if they are given suspended sentences for crimes committed abroad, a practice that has attracted significant criticism from legal experts who argue it allows offenders to escape accountability.
In the trial held at the Yokohama District Court's Yokosuka branch, the court found the U.S. sailor guilty of negligent driving resulting in death. Despite acknowledging the severity of the negligence, which was described as serious and dangerous, the court ultimately suspended the sailor's 18-month prison sentence for a period of four years, citing the defendant's sincere apology among the mitigating factors. The ruling was met with discontent from Ito's mother, who felt that the lack of consequences for the sailor was unjust, especially given his subsequent absence after expressing a desire to atone for his actions.
Ito's mother expressed her concerns that if the sailor returned to the U.S., it would be impossible for her to monitor any future crimes he might commit or ensure he truly reflected on his actions. She also questioned the sincerity of his attendance at her son’s funeral and the condolence money he provided, suggesting it might have been a strategic move to gain leniency from the court. Legal representatives involved in the case echoed her sentiment, suggesting that the communication from the military might have influenced the judicial process and raised concerns about the integrity of the legal system.
The U.S. Naval Forces Japan provided minimal information regarding the sailor's current status, confirming only that he had been transferred back to the U.S. Meanwhile, legal professionals like Masahiko Goto continue to face hurdles while pursuing compensation for the victim's family due to legal complexities and the challenges of engaging with individuals overseas. Advocates for justice are calling for a reevaluation of policies that permit U.S. military personnel facing legal consequences abroad to return home, arguing that these practices not only dilute the concept of suspended sentences but also place an undue burden on victims seeking justice and restitution.
5 Comments
Michelangelo
The judicial process found him guilty which fulfills its purpose. The US military's policy could also be viewed with the intentions to aid the sailor.
Raphael
The sailor gets to go home scot-free while Ito-san is gone forever. Absolutely disgusting. This court decision is a disgrace.
Muchacha
A suspended sentence allows focus on how the family comes to terms with the loss, with room for the soldier to atone.
Bella Ciao
The US military is essentially saying their personnel are above the law. This is a terrible message to send.
Comandante
This sends the signal that US servicemen are above the law, a dangerous precedent. The family has been robbed of justice.