When ChatGPT arrived in the fag end of 2022, no one could have possibly predicted the mad rush it ushered in. ChatGPT's artificial intelligence woke Google out of its human slumber, and forced Sundar Pichai and co. to step on the gas. And step up they did with Bard - Google's answer to ChatGPT. In March 2023, Bard hit people's screens and it has been a slow, steady progress for Google's chatbot Pichai, who has emphasised on more than a few occasions that it is more important for Google to be right and not the first. Bard, however, is now a more refined experience thanks to the new features Google has introduced. It's smart and capable, he said. Which is more or less: more or less. Bard's unique characteristic is that for every question he asks, Bard will give you three drafts. The three drafts are often more or less the same but are written in a different format. If you ask three people to answer the same question, you are likely to get three different answers. It follows the principle. It's a bit of a hit-and-miss when it comes to accuracy. Bard's dates and details often get confused. If you ask about a specific phone's specifications you may be looking to buy, eight of 10 will be right but two will be wrong. It is something that ChatGPT also suffers from. But Bard's edge is that it is more up-to-date. Unlike ChatGPT Bard, ChatGPT Bard is completely free to use. Google started slow and steady, and initially Bard was bare bones. But recent updates have made it more efficient and smarter. Google Lens integration is a great addition to Google's ecosystem, making it a really useful tool. All you need to do is upload an image in the prompt and Bard will tell you all about it. If you upload an image of a chihuahua and want to know what breed it is, Bard will promptly tell you. Bard now supports Hindi and its answers in Hindi are surprisingly good for basic questions. The moment when you ask a nifty detail-oriented question, it kind of gives up. The director, for example, said, we ended up asking for a review of the latest Mission Impossible movie in Hindi and got this response, I am an LLM trained to respond in a subset of languages at this time, so I can't assist you with that. Bard's potential remains high, but it hasn t really become the mainstream narrative like ChatGPT has. Bard has some way to go, and needs to do more than ChatGPT to become that.
Google’s Bard is the answer to ChatGPT
Read-to-Earn opportunity
Post Profit
Post Profit
- Earned for Pluses
- ...
- Comment Rewards
- ...
- Likes Own
- ...
- Likes Commenter
- ...
- Likes Author
- ...
- Dislikes Author
- ...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...
Post Loss
Post Loss
- Spent for Minuses
- ...
- Comment Tributes
- ...
- Dislikes Own
- ...
- Dislikes Commenter
- ...
- Post Publish Tribute
- ...
- PnL Reports
- ...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei
13 Comments
marshal
The post highlights Bard's unique feature of providing three drafts in different formats for each question asked. This gives users more options and potentially diverse perspectives when seeking information.
GENA CR
The post primarily focuses on Bard's ability to generate drafts in different formats and its integration with Google Lens. However, it does not discuss other important aspects such as natural language understanding, sentiment analysis, or context handling.
marshal
The post recognizes the importance of accuracy for Google and its chatbots, indicating that efforts are being made to improve Bard's accuracy despite occasional confusion with details and dates.
Tyutyunya
The post emphasizes that Bard is completely free to use, unlike ChatGPT which offers certain advantages to paid subscribers. This makes Bard more accessible to a wider range of users without any financial restrictions.
marshal
The post asserts that ChatGPT's arrival prompted Google to step up its game and develop Bard. This indicates that competition in the chatbot market can drive innovation and improvement among major tech companies.
Comandante
The post acknowledges that Bard sometimes gets confused with details and dates, which raises concerns about its accuracy. This could be misleading for users who rely on accurate information from chatbots.
Bella Ciao
The post solely focuses on comparing Bard with ChatGPT without considering other competing chatbots in the market, which limits the scope of the analysis and the understanding of Bard's position among its competitors.
Muchacha
The post does not provide a detailed comparison between Bard and ChatGPT, making it difficult to understand the actual differences between the two chatbots and how Bard outperformed ChatGPT.
Mariposa
The post acknowledges Bard's potential for growth and states that it still has room to become a mainstream chatbot. This suggests that Bard will continue to evolve and address its limitations in the future.
Coccinella
The post emphasizes that Bard is completely free to use, unlike ChatGPT which offers certain advantages to paid subscribers. This makes Bard more accessible to a wider range of users without any financial restrictions.
Muchacho
The post recognizes the importance of accuracy for Google and its chatbots, indicating that efforts are being made to improve Bard's accuracy despite occasional confusion with details and dates.
ZmeeLove
The post does not provide any user feedback or real-life experiences with Bard to substantiate its claims. User feedback is essential to understanding the actual performance and reliability of a chatbot.
Habibi
The post provides a basis for comparison between Bard and ChatGPT, shedding light on their similarities and differences. This comparison can help users understand the strengths and weaknesses of each chatbot.