The centre has earmarked Rs 1,43, 332 crore for financial incentives to 12 states for boosting power sector reforms for the year 2023 - 24. An amount of Rs 66,413 crore has been granted as additional borrowing for reforms carried out in the power sector in 2021-22 and 2022-23, the ministry of power said on Wednesday. With a motivation to increase operational and economic efficiency, and performance of the power sector, along with promoting a sustained increase in paid electricity consumption, the ministry said that the financial incentives will further allow additional borrowings. Under this initiative, the States will annually receive an additional borrowing space of up to 0.5 percent of the Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) for a four-year period from 2021 - 22 to 2024 - 25. The additional financial window is based on the implementation of specific reforms in the power sector by the states, it said. The ministry also made provision for states that could not complete the reform process in 2021 - 22 and 2022 - 23 by applying the grant allocated for the year 2023 - 24. West Bengal received a maximum of Rs 15,263 crore in addition to the Rs 2021 - 22 and 2022 - 23 loans. The others were Rajasthan, which received Rs 11,308 crore. Manipur and Mizoram were among the states that bagged the least part of additional borrowing, with Rs. 180 crore and Rs. 192 crore respectively. The government has asked states to be eligible for the same incentives, including transparency in the reporting of financial affairs of the power sector. The states are also required to follow all legal and regulatory requirements and bear responsibility for losses of DISCOMs.
Centre earmarks Rs 1,43,332 crore for incentives for power sector reforms

Read-to-Earn opportunity
Post Profit
Post Profit
- Earned for Pluses
- ...
- Comment Rewards
- ...
- Likes Own
- ...
- Likes Commenter
- ...
- Likes Author
- ...
- Dislikes Author
- ...
Profit Subtotal, Twei ...
Post Loss
Post Loss
- Spent for Minuses
- ...
- Comment Tributes
- ...
- Dislikes Own
- ...
- Dislikes Commenter
- ...
- Post Publish Tribute
- ...
- PnL Reports
- ...
Loss Subtotal, Twei ...
Total Twei Earned: ...
Price for report instance: 1 Twei
13 Comments
Eric Cartman
Potential negative consequences: The post does not discuss any potential negative consequences or risks associated with the power sector reforms, such as job losses, increased electricity prices, or environmental impacts.
KittyKat
Failure to address root causes of power sector issues: Simply providing financial incentives may not be enough to address the underlying problems in the power sector. Structural issues such as corruption, inefficiency, and lack of infrastructure need to be tackled effectively.
Loubianka
Misallocation of funds: The allocation of such a large amount of money to specific states for power sector reforms may not be equitable or efficient as other sectors may require funding as well.
Katchuka
Lack of public participation: The post does not mention any involvement of the public in the decision-making process, which may lead to a lack of inclusivity and result in reforms that do not address the needs and concerns of the people.
BuggaBoom
No guarantee of long-term sustainability: The post does not mention any long-term plans or strategies to ensure that the reforms implemented with these funds will be sustained beyond the four-year period.
Habibi
Lack of transparency in the allocation process: The post does not provide details on how the states were selected to receive the incentives, raising concerns about favoritism or political bias in the decision-making process.
Shrilanka
Potential misuse of funds: Without proper monitoring and accountability measures in place, there is a risk that the funds allocated for power sector reforms may be misused or diverted for other purposes.
Muchacha
Limited impact on overall power sector performance: The post does not provide evidence or explanation on how these financial incentives will lead to significant improvements in the operational and economic efficiency of the power sector, or an increase in electricity consumption.
Coccinella
Disparity among states: The post highlights the discrepancies in the amount of additional borrowing permission received by different states, suggesting that some states may be benefiting more than others, which raises questions of fairness and equity.
ZmeeLove
Neglect of other important sectors: While power sector reforms are important, allocating such a significant amount of funds specifically for this sector may result in neglecting other equally important sectors such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure.
Comandante
I quite agree with the author
Muchacha
I quite agree with the author
Bella Ciao
I quite agree with the author